Showing posts with label psychological horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychological horror. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Yes I Know, It's Another BLACK SWAN Review...

By now, everyone and their wicked stepmother has seen and reviewed Black Swan, the psychological thriller that has set the film world afire as of late. And because it is such a disturbing and frightening film, it has crossed over into the horror realm, leaving hordes of black T-shirt wearers giddy over the thought of a "serious" mainstream Hollywood film falling under their purview--and getting Oscar consideration, no less. It's like The Exorcist or The Silence of the Lambs all over again.

In the wake of all the buzz, I recently had the pleasure of finally catching the film, along with my undead cohort Captain Cruella, as a welcome break in the midst of our multitudinous online and real-world activities. And I must say it turned into a whole lot more than a simple diversion for either of us. In fact, I'd say we both agreed that it was one of the best, if not the best film of 2010, in our experience. And so, I'm sorry, dear readers, but you will have to sit through yet another gushing review of this breathtaking movie from Darren Aronofsky. The man who brought us such fine work as Requiem for a Dream and The Wrestler has done it again with this mind-frak of a flick, starring the amazing Natalie Portman as Nine Sayers, an aspiring ballerina up for the dual lead role in a slick new production of Swan Lake. I haven't seen every nominated performance, but it's difficult for me to imagine Portman not taking home the Best Actress Oscar for this.

My initial reaction to the film was to think of it as "Suspiria meets Jacob's Ladder", and while this summation is a bit too neat and not really accurate, there are definitely elements of both. You have the balletic backdrop, with so much psychological strife being dredged up as a result of it; and you have the very real horrors of the mind gone mad, causing the viewer to lose sight of the line between fantasy and reality.

I spent part of the film trying to discern if what I was watching was supernatural in nature, or all in our main character's mind. The taut, kinetic script--a collaboration of young, relatively untested screenwriters Andres Heinz, Mark Heyman and John J. McLaughlin--keeps us on our toes, and pulls us deeper and deeper into Nina's internal world. Make no mistake, this is horror--only horror in the same sense that a film like Moon is horror.

Along those lines, the movie fairly is obsessed with bodily trauma, in an almost Cronenbergian way. In particular, the fixation on finger/fingernails was particularly disturbing, akin in some way to Lucio Fulci's eyeball fetish. Our writers--as well as the always-intense Aronofksy--definitely understand the kinds of things that get inside the head of the average person, and use that knowledge to great advantage in engendering a cinematic environment that manages to both keep the viewer completely off-kilter while also enthralling with its gorgeous lushness.

A large part of the credit must also go to Matthew Libatique, Aronofsky's cinematographer on both Pi and Requiem, who triumphantly returns here with a visual painting that speaks to the viewer in a way that no dialogue ever could. This is the power of the camera, and why film will always be a vision-based medium, first and foremost. The imagery, combined with Clint Mansell's original score and the overarching snippets of Tchaikovsky's Swan Lake itself, provide quite the potent cocktail, and it's one which surely held me in its spell from beginning to end.

It's difficult to describe the intensity of the experience of watching the film. I honestly sat there in the theater chair gripping the armrests with white knuckles from time to time--and this comes from a rather jaded film-goer who is more than capable of deconstructing the art while in the process of viewing. When a film can still get to me like that, I know it's good.

The journey of Natalie Portman's character Nina is an almost mythic one, yet told on a completely personal level. In her efforts to uncover the dark, "black swan" aspect of her personality, she delves deep within herself, with mounting horror at what she discovers--and we're right there with her, along for the ride. It's a journey of growing dread, and as the film progresses, it takes on almost Kafka-esque proportions. It's the journey of the mind made physical--who says Expressionism is dead?

This is clearly the performance of Portman's career, and if anything, witnessing the magnitude of her dramatic power here is proof positive that George Lucas--who directed her to utterly wooden results in his Star Wars prequels--has absolutely no idea of how to work with live, human actors. But in addition to Portman, Black Swan is also populated with a variety of powerhouse performances. These include the striking Barbara Hershey, whose own faded beauty only adds to the strength of her turn as Nina's overbearing failed ballerina mother; Vincent Cassell as Nina's mentor Thomas, hilariously described in a recent Saturday Night Live spoof as "the world's only straight French ballet choreographer"; and Winona Ryder in an unexpectedly shocking and harrowing appearance as Nina's onstage predecessor and the former paramour of Thomas.

It's long been said that the most terrifying material of all is that which festers inside us--in essence, that the truest horror is the horror of the human mind gone awry. And Black Swan is certainly a classic example of this--a worthy successor to films like Repulsion and Carnival of Souls, that force us to confront the fact that we all have within us the capacity to drive ourselves mad.

Nina's startling transformation into the black swan is the transformation of an individual who can only find release in the acceptance of that within her which also has the power to destroy her. The result is a film of great power--an intimate portrait of the human mind, which also manages to be simultaneously epic in scope. This is horror of the most cerebral variety--deeply rewarding, and utterly unforgettable.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

The Lucky 13: Week Seven: Psychological Horror


I think this is probably a somewhat intimidating sub-genre, which accounts for the smaller amount of contributions this week. After all, how to define psychological horror, exactly? In a certain sense, almost all horror can be said to be "psychological" in nature, pressing certain buttons in our heads, manipulating us in various ways. Psychological horror certainly bleeds into a lot of other categories, and can take many forms.

Movie-going being a decidedly subjective act, it's interesting to take note of which films certain viewers find to be psychologically focused--which films got inside their heads in particular. Both here and over at Brutal as Hell, there are some interesting choices on display. These are movies which may or not be explicitly horrific in nature, but which all derive much of their power from the games they play with our minds...

B-Sol on Psycho

The year was 1960, and change was in the air for horror films, as it was for the movie business in general. The first shot would be fired by one of the business' most established and respected directors, Alfred Hitchcock, whose seminal suspense flick set a standard that would be a sign of things to come. Here, it was not some outlandish monster, but the guy next door who was the instrument of terror. It was not some baroque fantasy world in which the action was set, but the very real world in which we lived. This would become a hallmark of the modern horror movie.

No other decade has such a single dominant horror character as the 1960s does with Norman Bates, Robert Bloch's amazing Ed Gein-inspired creation. Bernard Hermann's composition adds so much--it is not just a film score, it is the film score. Janet Leigh was nominated for an Oscar, and Anthony Perkins should've been. With one of the most well-known climaxes in film history, it still packs a hell of a punch. The reason: absolutely breathtaking film-making. It gets no better.

It's become a film school standby, and one of the most revered films ever made--and it's not even Hitchcock's best. A true master of the medium, Hitch dazzles effortlessly with gorgeous composition and a pacing rhythm that gives you no choice but to watch.



From Beyond Depraved's Joe Monster on Eraserhead

“Psychological horror” certainly seems to be an interesting phrase. When you think about it, shouldn’t all horror films technically qualify as psychological? As a fellow blogger recently pointed out to me in a paraphrased quote from Douglas E. Winter, horror is not a genre, it is an emotion. At times it appears some people forget that. They think that severed heads and furry monsters in a movie instantly qualify it as a “horror film.” But what about the emotion of horror? When does it ever leap from the screen and attack our most vulnerable spot, the fears within our own minds? In my mind, there is no film that has evoked this type of sensation in me more brilliantly than Eraserhead.

Essentially plotless, the film follows the exploits of a bloke named Henry, a factory worker off on vacation in a post-apocalyptic world, who must now cope with the presence of a mutated child in his life and the ever-promising words of the lyrical Lady in the Radiator. Does that make sense to you? The point is that it doesn’t. Eraserhead works with a sense of dream logic that is at first befuddling and mystifying all at the same time. Things happen just because they can and that’s all there is to it. This film is one of the prime examples of the closest thing to a genuine nightmare being filmed on celluloid. There are countless images and sequences that will play in your head days after viewing this. They’ll leave their mark burned in your brain, ringing in your head like the squelching cries of Henry’s hideous child-thing.

The chicken dinner scene, the dream sequence in which Henry’s cranium is taken to a pencil factory, the cadaverous man turning the rusting gears, and the slimy sperm-like creatures that constantly slither across the screen are just some of the horrors that one is to witness during a viewing of this film. I’ve attributed watching this film to riding a carousel of the damned, the trip leaving you with a dizzying and warped sense of your surroundings. That might be a bit of hyperbole, but there’s no doubt that Eraserhead won’t get into your head and make you feel at least a little uncomfortable. But underneath all the grime and dirt, there are hints of true beauty. It’s a testament to David Lynch’s power as a filmmaker to make things so vile and disgusting appear attractive on more than one occasion.

Poetic, surreal, disturbing, and even blackly humorous at times, Eraserhead is a unique viewing experience. It’s certainly not for all tastes. It may inspire deep thinking, provoke nervous giggles, or just stupefy the viewer into a shocked silence. No matter what the reaction, Eraserhead is sure to wield its warped magic over you, leaving you shaken one way or the other. It’s best to watch this film alone, without the comfort of loved and close ones. Eraserhead will alienate you and make you feel like you’re a lone being in the vast, cold, and dark recesses of the most hellish regions of space. What more incentive do you need to watch this film than that?



Day of the Woman's BJ-C on Hard Candy

If Dateline NBC has taught us anything, it's that the world is swimming in a sea of pedophiles who get their rocks off in online chatrooms with pre-teens and children. If horror films have taught us anything, it's that 14-year-old girls can exact their revenge and bring on one hell of a firestorm of psychological torture. Witness the ever creepy and forever chilling psychological thrill-ride Hard Candy.

Hard Candy is the story of a 14-year-old girl named Hayley Stark who meets a 30-something photographer named Jeff in an online chat room. The two agree to meet up in public, despite the age difference, as the two were casually flirting before. What starts off as a tale of a man with a Lolita complex and a 14-year-old girl caught up in something she shouldn't be, takes a twisted and torturous turn. A cat-and-mouse game as insane as it is beautiful, Hard Candy delivers a provocative take on the horrifying concept of revenge, and keeps audiences on the edges of their seats.

I will spare the details for anyone who has yet to see the film, but it is by far one of the more demented films I have witnessed, and shows that Ellen Page can play much more than sharp tongued teenagers. As the story begins to unfold, it becomes ever so obvious that 14-year-old Hayley Stark isn't going to be taken advantage of by a man twice her age, not by a long shot. There is a scene that throws any man for a loop for about 20 minutes, and convinces the audience of his inevitable demise... and she never even touches him. While the good ol' days may be famous for keeping their audiences in a tizzy, Hard Candy shows that the psychological horror sub-genre is still thriving.



* * * * * * * * * *

Head over to Brutal as Hell to see what Marc Patterson and his crew have come up with. And if you're interested in taking part in the future, just give Marc or myself a holler.

Week 1: Grindhouse & Exploitation
Week 2: Creature Features & Monster Movies
Week 3: Demons, Witches & The Devil
Week 4: Gore!
Week 5: Horror Comedies
Week 6: Vampires

Join us next week, when it's back to some good old fashioned monsters, with the finest in werewolf cinema!